In sustainability’s triple bottom line of profits, planet and people, it’s people that tend to get the shaft. There’s an entire industry surrounding environmental advocacy and we can always count on business interests to fight for stable economies, but what about the social resilience of our communities?
Personally, I consider the social leg to be the most critical, as I’m unconvinced that we’ll ever be able to effectively handle the challenges of the other two — especially at the local level in times of turmoil and change — in the absence of the rich social interdependencies that used to define us.
Get reconnected first. Then save the planet and the economy.
To that end, I offer today’s post as a response to the municipal question: “Where do we start?” It’s surely not a comprehensive list — in fact, I’ll be seeking your thoughts on how to expand it later — and I’ve given very short shrift to some very weighty subjects. Nonetheless, if you’re looking to bulk up the strength of your community, especially in these times of limited resources, these are the areas that provide the greatest returns.
1. Good governance
Strong community begins and ends with something you can’t fake: trust. Elected officials, city hall, and other community leaders listening, engaging in a meaningful examination of competing agendas and trade-offs, and acting on what they’ve heard is the process through which you transcend political stagnation and start getting somewhere. Leadership is key to setting the collaborative tone which, in time and in practice, can become a collaborative culture.
2. Walkable, connected, mixed-use character
Our human desire to be together is embedded in the built form of the traditional city. Not to say or even imply that such patterns create community but, rather, that they foster it. They make community easier, as they contain lessons from a time when we lacked the wherewithal to deny our need for one another. We had to be together, and our cities and towns reflected that.
Regardless of why you’re looking to build community, development patterns matter. If you’ve got historic areas, recognize their embedded wisdom and work to preserve them. And for new growth, take on the fact that, across the continent, many of our most admired, human-scaled practices are currently illegal. Reform your current zoning or replace it with a more character and context-sensitive form-based code.
3. Parks and gardens
For compact, walkable communities to thrive, they need contrast. They need the intensity of human settlement to be offset by areas for recharge — both environmental and emotional. Municipalities often table investments in parks due to costs and that’s a mistake, as it assumes that the only parks of value are large, centrally managed ones.
Redefining how you categorize and manage parks, in and of itself, can be a community-building act because it leads you to all new options — surplus land reclamation, community gardens, shared green spaces — where design and maintenance can be downloaded to the community. Given opportunity and a sense of ownership, many people will assume a commensurate level of responsibility. And in the course of taking it on, they develop a broader web of connections that can be leveraged later.
4. Partnerships
You can’t do it all. No local government has the time or money to do everything that needs to be done. Nor should they. Instead, the more programs and initiatives delegated from the plates of city government to the often-more-appropriate task lists of community businesses, institutions, nonprofits, associations, advocates, or willing residents, the better. Not only is this the more fiscally prudent course of action, it’s a direct form of community engagement and empowerment, which further strengthens trust and interdependence.
Map your community’s assets, draft lists of who has skills, resources and capacity to leverage, and start building bridges. Sometimes, the greatest contribution local government can make towards the solving of a problem is learning how to get out of the way. And the stronger your community gets, the more opportunities you’ll have to do so.
5. Programming
Festivals, events and other activities are key opportunities for community mingling and celebration but don’t assume that everything needs to be orchestrated by city hall. For every city-wide gathering in your downtown park or square, there’s an equal need for gatherings at the block and neighborhood levels. In fact, the most creative and compelling events are often roots-up rather than top-down. In Ithaca, New York, for example, residents created Porchfest, an all-day affair where bands — over a hundred this past year — perform on porches and in front yards across two neighborhoods. A central organization establishes time slots, sets the schedule and handles promotion, then people simply wander around, spending time together and listening to music. All the city has to do is step aside.
6. Neighborhood-responsive schools
Nothing has the potential to bring people together more effectively than schools but two trends in contemporary education undermine their value as community-builders: monolithic, bureaucratic school systems and the removal of schools from the neighborhoods they serve. In short, our efforts towards efficiency have failed because they’ve largely severed one of the largest resources schools have at their disposal: the sense of emotional ownership taken by the surrounding community.
It’s fully acknowledged that school systems typically operate independent of their respective municipalities and no suggestion is made that this is an issue easily solved. But, as a rule, these are the truths that should power your efforts: Schools should be physically integrated with the populations they serve and there should be mechanisms in place that download a meaningful level of decision-making authority to the parents, teachers and school administrators contending with the realities of their local context.
7. Tree culture
More often than not, communities concerned about their tree canopy deal with its preservation through ordinances that prevent tree removal. Not to say that such ordinances are categorically wrong, mind you. Just that, by focusing mostly on trees at what’s often the tail end of their lives — the ones that get the most notice and inspire the greatest affection — they steal attention from what should be the greater goal.
Yes, preventing the death of a tree preserves your existing canopy, at least for a while, but it does nothing beyond the lifespan of what’s currently on the ground. Equally notable is that, by forcing tree activists and property rights advocates to square off in a battle over who’s in the right, these ordinances actually end up being corrosive to the very community you’re trying to build. Instead, communities should put their focus on an ongoing program of tree planting. Perpetual canopy replenishment. Not only does this present an opportunity for government, residents, and organizations to proactively work together in perpetuity, further enhancing your community fabric, it establishes and fosters a new, more sustainable culture in which the death of any one tree, while mourned, is viewed in the context of larger cultural values and does not end up being reduced to a criminal act. In short, it puts us all on the same side.
Surely there’s more
I’ve been mentally building and verifying this list for the past decade but this is the first time I’ve taken a stab at writing it down. What do you think? Is there anything I’ve missed? Where should communities be concentrating their efforts to strengthen their social fabric?
–Scott Doyon
If PlaceShakers is our soapbox, our Facebook page is where we step down, grab a drink and enjoy a little conversation. Looking for a heads-up on the latest community-building news and perspective from around the web? Click through and “Like” us and we’ll keep you in the loop.
The most important factor is socioeconomic integration.
People of varying incomes must be able to easily form social networks that enhance socioeconomic mobility and spur economic growth.
Great point, Matt. I suppose I had this one mentally filed under “Walkable, connected, mixed-use character” but definitely failed to address it in the narrative. A worthy addition moving forward. –SD
Yes, what you missed was the foundation for good neighborhoods and places and that is safe, affordable housing. Communities will flourish when there is an adequate supply of affordable housing for families, workers, seniors close to all the amenities you described above. But it has to start with a place to live. And building on what Matt said, maintaining existing affordable housing in areas being revitalized and building new affordable housing is critical to supporting and enhancing integration and economic stability for all.
I agree, Cathy, but will have to put some thought into it, as the devil is clearly in the execution. Much of what I’ve identified, I think, are things which lay the groundwork for exactly what you’re referring to: a physical context which allows for a variety of context-appropriate housing solutions — both subsidized and market-responsive — and a social context more amenable to the idea that categorizing ourselves by income is bad policy. –SD
yep, it’s all about sense of place, which now i realize includes good governance. thanks for the additional insight.
What about sports/recreation opportunities?
Sort of (but not necessarily) goes with parks, I guess
I agree with the introductory comment that the people tend to get the least attention of the triple bottom line. We founded our company to specifically address this shortcoming.
I do like Cathy’s comment about housing. One of our ideas is to create a mixed generational housing style (similar in concept to mixed-use). More detail at http://www.humanlifeproject.blogspot.com/2012/01/mixed-generational-housing-seniors-and.html
We are hoping that this concept will facilitate such things as aging in neighborhood, while allowing better utilization of the larger family housing by having the empty nesters move a really short distance (a few feet to a few houses) to a smaller unit to allow the next family to move into the larger units.
One missing topic, for me, is local food. For example for #7, Tree Culture, I would recommend considering changing the trees to be fruit trees. We live in Denver for which water is a limited resource. I would like to see our limited water going towards food production instead of trying to make Denver look like the more water abundant East coast or Midwest.
Good list, Scott, and great conversation starter.
I would add local ownership. There is a growing body of sociological and anthropological research finding that communities that have a larger share of independent businesses have more “collective efficacy” — the ability to come together to solve problems. Specifically, they’ve found, all else being equal, the share of the economy that is locally owned correlates with more community organizations, more participation in civic life, and even more voting.
More here:
http://www.ilsr.org/local-ownership-healthier-wealthier-wiser/
Within mixed-use development that exemplifies community building, a mix of travel options is inherent. Walkability alone cannot connect neighborhoods and districts separated by long distance. Mass transit should be considered a fundamental mode of travel necessary to reduce our absurd dependency upon automobiles. Nothing isolates people from their communities more than driving. We’d better plan for the day when driving as we know it ends.
Oh wait. Corporate America has determined that our future depends upon autonomous, self-driving cars. Open the door, Hal. I can’t do that, Dave.
The author has forgotten the other leg of sustainable development– social equity. Tom Sanchez and I discuss this in our new book from Island Press, “Planning as if People Matter: Governing for Social Equity.”
It’s not that I’ve forgotten it, Marc. Simply that I categorize it under my number one point, good governance. Granted the language of social equity could be more explicitly spelled out — as I share your view of its importance — but it’s inherent in my larger point: Strong community begins and ends with trust which local government simply can’t build in any meaningful way without being fair and equitable in their dealings with and distribution of services to their various constituencies. Good governance doesn’t apply to some of the people. It’s gotta be evenly applied to all the people. –SD
A very nice step toward dealing with a critical issue.
I’d say one place to start is by creating information hubs where knowledge about community issues are aggregated and made available to support the involvement of others in the community. The Open Indicators Consortium hosts links to projects in various cities that do some of this information aggregation. http://info.oicweave.org/projects/weave/wiki/About_The_Open_Indicators_Consortium
However, I think there is a need to combine poverty and indicators mapping with overlays of social service providers operating in different parts of a city. In the Chicago Tutor/Mentor Program Locator I host a database of nearly 170 non-school tutoring and/or mentoring programs. http://www.tutormentorprogramlocator.net
With this information available to anyone in the community, the next steps would be to encourage on-going learning in which people in faith groups, businesses, civic and social organizations are reading articles hosted on aggregation sites and discussing what that means to them and ways to use their talent, time, dollars and political connections to improve the support system and opportunities for youth and families in the high poverty parts of the community.
I describe this process in this pdf – http://tinyurl.com/TMI-4-part-strategy
575416 611105You must indulge in a contest for one of the greatest blogs over the internet. Ill suggest this web site! 585083
If I missed it, I apologize, but safety is the most important factor in having strong, vibrant communities. Great article, great discussion!