Last week, we were talking about how the form of a neighborhood either provides gathering places that build social capital and local resilience, or else makes for a lonely, disconnected, nowhere. Some towns and cities are using form-based codes to help reconnect people with each other and the places they call home.
At the end of last week’s discussion, I quickly mentioned ten points that can create problems with form-based codes. My friend, Bruce Donnelly, commented that some of these points bear elaboration. So today, I’m doing a back of the envelope on the biggest challenge to form-based codes: failing to establish a community vision that can then be codified — that is, made into law.
Maybe you could boil down many of our dysfunctions — from local governments to individual choices — to not taking the time to establish a vision. A sort of “what I want to be when I grow up” process that leaves behind the vagaries and platitudes that generate places that fall short of being unique.
Great visions almost always center on what is special about a place. Smaller cities often focus on natural features, like mountains, waterways, or plains. Or extraordinary social amenities, like strong arts and cultural communities, or foodie havens, or quaint main streets built for antiquing and local music. Bigger cities almost always offer up creative class amenities like “Start-Up City Miami” or “Strong, Smart New York” or “Toronto the Big.” Or maybe it’s “Dare to Live Outdoors San Diego” or the great “Pub Sheds” in Decatur or Asheville.
Visions that can be codified — made into land use laws that say how neighborhoods will form — are much more nuanced than a slogan or a core competency, though. They’re broken down into vision, policy, actions, and plans, along with public-private partners who are willing to do the hard work of bringing it all to reality. The Vision Keepers, if you will.
One of the most enjoyable form-based codes I’ve ever helped lead was thanks to a great city planner, Gianni Longo, who had done the hard work of helping craft a vision for Kona, Hawai’i. When we came in to help with the form-based code, the well-articulated vision was strongly supported locally, and the codification was a delightful process.
Often policy planning, master planning, and land use law are more closely married, and that’s when it’s sometimes harder to ensure there is a “collective local vision” — although I realize that many people have issues with this phrase. While a “consensus plan” may not pander to the most extreme special interest groups, it generally seeks to find common ground.
Looking at a few vision documents that have generated great codes and plans, El Paso, Ranson, and Miami come quickly to mind. Quoting a bit from Ranson:
All of the goals in the Community Vision assume the principle of Connectivity: a fine network of thoroughfares should knit together the community. The goals also all draw upon the principle of sustainability: places must be ecologically, fiscally, and socially sustainable.
1. Local character builds regional economies.
2. Strong core communities make strong foundations.
3. There is a place for everything, and everything has its place.
4. Affordable living includes housing, transportation, energy, recreation, and shopping.
5. Green infrastructure supports sustainable communities.
6. Neighborhoods are the building blocks.
7. Private buildings and public infrastructure work together to shape public space and to build community character.
8. Working together creates bigger opportunities.
Of course, each of these items have a whole host of idea development and supporting actions, but the point is that the City has spent the time to articulate what it believes, hashed out the details to get to common grounds, then wrote it all into law with a form-based code.
And that’s what’ll get you around item one for the biggest Achilles’ Heel possible for your form-based code: failing to articulate a generally-accepted local vision.
Now, once again for a little inspiration from Steve Mouzon, documenting Paris — perhaps the most extreme example of a vision getting implemented, even if it wasn’t the “collective local vision” but rather a much heavier-handed version of top-down planning. Nonetheless, it’s one of the few cities where even the bridges are able to bring me to tears. Enjoy!
If PlaceShakers is our soapbox, our Facebook page is where we step down, grab a drink and enjoy a little conversation. Looking for a heads-up on the latest community-building news and perspective from around the web? Click through and “Like” us and we’ll keep you in the loop.
Thanks, Hazel! Good thoughts. Here’s a thought about keeping a vision on a neighborhood scale: A Town Architect can be the embodiment of vision-keeping if they serve long enough. For example, I’ve served as Town Architect of the Preserve in Hoover, Alabama for over a decade now. The Preserve is just now inaugurating its fourth project manager (USSteel is the developer) and the fourth guy has never even met the first one, I don’t think. This is similar to the rate at which mayors are elected. So it’s great if there’s someone serving in some significant capacity who can embody vision-keeping for a place.
Hi Steve, my staff and I enjoy your work greatly. If our Council members and Planning Commissioners don’t have email, we print and distribute the articles to them. Do you by chance know Rip Weaver?
Take care,
Ian Cordwell
Director of Planning
Town of Cave Creek, Arizona
Thanks, Steve, for the good points. You’re right on about the Town Architect being the vision keeper for a private developer, just like a Design & Development Center can be a vision keeper for the City or Town. Of course, that assumes there’s a clear vision in the first place! Question for you: have you been a traveling Town Architect for a municipality yet? If so, I’d be interested to hear more about that experience.
Ian, I agree! We at PlaceMakers are guided by Steve’s ideas, who used to be part of our team formally. I’m just leaving your state this morning, after working this week on ReInvent Phoenix, with the DPZ charrette team. Some inspiring regional vision in evidence!