Neighborhood Units Matter

Urban Design is concerned with the practice of designing, repurposing and revitalizing 3-dimensional places. These place types are described in Charter of the New Urbanism principles, as, “The neighborhood, the district, and the corridor are the essential elements of development and redevelopment in the metropolis. They form identifiable areas — centers, edges and in-between — that encourage citizens to take responsibility for their maintenance and evolution. Neighborhoods should be compact, pedestrian-friendly, and mixed-use. Districts generally emphasize a special single use, such as airports, campuses, and industry. Corridors are regional connectors of neighborhoods and districts; they range from boulevards and rail lines to rivers and parkways.” Personally, I add ‘downtowns’ as another essential element of city-making.

The full spectrum of neighborhood, district and corridor development intensity ranges from more-to-less urban to more-to-less rural, and downtown usually sets the most urban bar for a region. From downtown’s uber-urban benchmark, designers, decision-makers, and citizens are then able to gauge where and when their places fit within said region.

While discussions over definitions tend to become pedantic, our fuzzy rhetoric of ‘villages,’ ‘neighborhoods,’ and ‘communities’ characterizes contemporary planning discourse, and underscores the need for conceptual clarity. In fact, if we cannot agree on a working definition of a ‘neighborhood’, comparative analysis becomes impossible, and may perpetuate our inability to easily build the mixed-use, walkable, connected places we increasingly demand. For example, the City of San Diego’s award-winning “City of Villages” General Plan lacks definitions of their excellent hierarchy of village types (employment districts, transit corridors, downtown, urban, community and neighborhood centers), and therefore defaults to citizens haggling over density and singular land uses when making any built form decisions.

A Community is defined as, “a group of people living in the same place or having a particular characteristic in common.” Many places have different social communities inhabiting them, such as an elderly, or arts, or ethnic community living and/or working in close proximity to one another. Community policy planning sub-areas host a variety of neighborhoods, districts and corridors, and are usually defined by political boundaries and historic development plats. Therefore, implementing specific urban design interventions at the community-scaled planning has proved to be a difficult endeavor.

Example of an existing community plan. Click for larger view.

Example of an existing community plan. Image by: North Park Planning Group. Click for larger view.

           

A Neighborhood Unit is the physical place those many different social communities inhabit and the key element to placemaking. Neighborhoods are defined by a discernible mixed-use center, well-defined edges and usually with blocks of general housing in-between. Defined by the ubiquitous 5-minute walk (a pedestrian shed) on relatively flat topography in a temperate climate, a neighborhood provides for the daily needs of its local residents, workers, shoppers and visitors as they consist of both public (streets/squares) and private (homes/shops) realms. Complexity occurs when multiple neighborhoods form either more urban Regional Centers or less urban Town or Community Centers place types. The Neighborhood Unit is the foundational element, easily regulated by SmartCode, Place-Based and Form-Based Code (FBC) development standards.

Neighborhoods, Districts and Corridors. Diagram: Geoff Dyer. Click for larger view.

Neighborhoods, Districts and Corridors. Diagram: Geoff Dyer. Click for larger view.

           

Villages are more rural, stand-alone, communities larger than a hamlet (a stand-alone neighborhood) or town (which would include a downtown). Villages may also be a self-contained community within a larger city regarded as having more rural characteristics of village life. Greenwich Village is a great example, as it is a series of relatively low-rise, more residential neighborhoods set within New York City.

These place types become more complex when we overlay transit station area types. For example, a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) pedestrian-shed is usually located at the confluence of four neighborhood units. Therefore, the edges of these neighborhoods are the most intense and the edge of the TOD is located in the usually public center of these same neighborhoods. I recommend thinking of Neighborhood Units as regulatory-based types and TODs as more policy-based place types as TODs differ by transit-types: bike; jitney; bus; Bus Rapid Transit; streetcar; Light Rail; Commuter Rail; national and High-Speed Rail.

TOD Diagram.

TOD Diagram. Image credit: Peter Calthorpe.

The various types of neighborhood units are necessary in helping us understand how to build on a Main Street, Neighborhood Street or Parkway. Without well-defined neighborhoods, districts and corridors, cities continue to spin their wheels when trying to implement great buildings and streets in existing urban neighborhoods. Definitions are important to making effective community-wide decisions. Effectiveness is determined by how well a community communicates, which is why proven place-type definitions are important in the placemaking process.

Neighborhood Units have proven to make planning and design more manageable in Denver, Miami, and Ventura (cities that have recently implemented FBCs), but are still mostly missing from municipal policies and codes. Defining Neighborhood Units enables new development to make Community Character compatibility decisions versus 2-dimensional Land Use compatibility conformance findings.

Declension of Place Types. Click for larger view.

Declension of Place Types. Image credit: Peter Richards. Click for larger view.

           

Howard Blackson

If PlaceShakers is our soapbox, our Facebook page is where we step down, grab a drink and enjoy a little conversation. Looking for a heads-up on the latest community-building news and perspective from around the web? Click through and “Like” us and we’ll keep you in the loop.

Comments

  1. The neighborhood should become a cyber-community of up to 10K. We should live and work and be educated in cyber-communities. We should be able to reach everything by foot or bike within minutes. Cyber-communities should be built on matrixes that enclose the whole. The elements of cyber-communities should be standard and lego-like. A scaled-down downtown should exist in each cyber-community. Cars should be relegated to the periphery of cyber-communities. There is no need for more than four levels above-ground in a cyber-community. A city should consist of ten or more cyber-communities. Cyber-communities should be stair-free with graded walkways. A stadium suggests the forms and functions of a cyber-community. Current planning on past principles will delay progress. Work in downtown Las Vegas suggests the potential of a cyber-community. The cyber-age is in its infancy and cyber-communities are its living units.

  2. Neighborhood units definitely matters. Far too many city centers have been taken over by corpocrats, turning the centers into zombie-towns without real life.
    Most people enjoy living in compact neighborhoods where proximity and pedestrians have priority. The sustainable societies that we must develop, are of course compact. http://ufbutv.com/2012/08/23/the-sustainable-society-of-2040/

  3. Great post. It’s motivated me to formulate a commentary on the matrix of issues you’ve illustrated. The neighbourhood unit is key to regeneration around the West. In the UK the use of the term Neighbourhood Planning has taken on certain meanings but the effects on popular awareness about “neighbourhoods” can be generalised. Canadian and American communities and planners would do well to incorporate the nuanced understandings of “neighbourhood” which the Brits have managed to retain. For example they also use the term to describe rural nodes with their catchment. I’m head deep in this subject, thanks for clarity! :)

Trackbacks

  1. [...] World Green Building Council    |   World green roofs    | Green rooftops blog  |  Why we should use our roofs in the fight against climate change? |  Architecture for humanity   |    Mother nature network  |  Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)  |  Amazing new house proves that green doesn’t have to mean expensive  |   Norwegian green building council  |  Build resilient in an unstoppable world  | Underinvesting in resilience – Get resilient |   Zero-energy building  |  The impact of  green space on urban communities  |   New solar structures cool buildings in full sunlight  |  Building a climate resilient nation  |  The importance of green roof infrastructure  | Titan Brick – for green construction  |  Finland’s floating village  |  With help from nature, a town aims to be solar capital  |  Lessons for building a solar economy  |  Green roofs |  Island in the sun: Why are our cities heating up faster than everywhere else?  |  L.A. launches nation’s largest solar rooftop program  |  Sustainable Architecture: 5 Reasons To Love Green Buildings  |  Neighborhood units matter [...]

  2. [...] World Green Building Council    |   World green roofs    | Green rooftops blog  |  Why we should use our roofs in the fight against climate change? |  Architecture for humanity   |   Mother nature network  |  Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)  |  Amazing new house proves that green doesn’t have to mean expensive  |   Norwegian green building council  |  Build resilient in an unstoppable world  | Underinvesting in resilience – Get resilient |   Zero-energy building  |  The impact of  green space on urban communities  |   New solar structures cool buildings in full sunlight  |  Building a climate resilient nation  |  The importance of green roof infrastructure  | Titan Brick – for green construction  |  Finland’s floating village  |  With help from nature, a town aims to be solar capital  |  Lessons for building a solar economy  |  Earthships – environmental constructions  |  Rules for smarter growth  |   Ideas for making growth smarter  |  Green roofs  |   Nullhus (Skanska)  | Kruse Smith – klimaengasjert og miljøbevisst | Asplan Viak med i Powerhouse  | Nordic Green Space Award til Strandpromenaden i Kristiansand  |   Island in the sun: Why are our cities heating up faster than everywhere else?  |   Sustainable Architecture: 5 Reasons To Love Green Buildings  |  Neighborhood units matter [...]

  3. [...] via Neighborhood Units Matter | PlaceMakers. [...]

  4. [...] Neighborhood Units Matter | PlaceMakers. Read more [...]

Join the Conversation

*

Confirm that you are not a bot - select a man with raised hand: