CNU 22 Buffalo: Gearing up for another Stern talkin’ to

Urban circles echoed with the sound of jaws collectively hitting the floor recently, as the Congress for the New Urbanism made the unexpected announcement that famed architect Robert A.M. Stern would be dropping by CNU 22 in Buffalo to make the case for how the lessons of garden suburbs — which he explores in his new book, “Paradise Planned” — can guide both exurban and inner-city (re)development moving forward.

On the face of it, the announcement seems a perfectly reasonable, perhaps even predictable, fit. Stern’s 250-person firm played a prominent role in Disney’s master-planned Celebration; he’s a recipient of CNU’s Athena Award, “issued in honor of those who have cast a lasting and enduring influence on the practice and thought of New Urbanism;” and he’s been characterized by CNU co-founder Andrés Duany as having “turned Yale School of Architecture into the most open-minded architecture school in the United States.”

So why the general sense of disbelief, befuddlement and all around head scratching?

Credit: CNU

Credit: CNU

Well, some might recall the last time Mr. Stern dropped by CNU — 2007 in Philadelphia — and raised no shortage of eyebrows with an exuberant, and unexpected, critique of his hosts. Reported Philip Langdon in the New Urban News:

“The most bizarre event in this May’s Congress for the New Urbanism was a Saturday evening speech in which Robert A.M. Stern lambasted new urbanists for producing results he judged to be far below his standards. It was a very odd lecture, one that left much of the audience in Philadelphia’s Kimmel Hall incensed.”

“Stern took the podium and argued for [..] 40 minutes that New Urbanism is failing dismally to achieve its mission. He charged that new urbanists are building on the suburban fringe when they ought to ‘tackle the urbanism of long-established cities.’ He accused new urban developments of lacking the quality associated with the Garden City movement. ‘We have come nowhere near to the achievements of our predecessors,’ Stern declared.”

Langdon’s header for the article? “With friends like these…”

Bring it on

It may seem a little counter-intuitive for CNU to extend a warm howdya-do after being unexpectedly whacked in the face but that’s actually the new urbanist way. And it’s one of the things that’s kept me engaged with the organization over the years.

In short, if your ideas can’t stand up to scrutiny and debate, then there’s probably not a whole lot to them. New urbanists embrace the contrarian, sometimes learning from them and other times winning the day through the fact that, despite any weak executions that may exist on the ground, we’re rooted in historic principles that have proven — in many ways indisputably — to work.

Perhaps you recall CNU 19 in Madison, Wisconsin, when Andrés went head-to-head with Charles Waldheim over Landscape Urbanism. Or CNU 20 in West Palm Beach, Florida, when he sparred with Dan Solomon over prescriptive coding. For many, myself included, these moments were high points in CNU’s history, illustrating just how challenging and entertaining the organization’s yearly event could be.

And thus, at least so far as far as I’m concerned, the ideological battle is won. And we won it. What’s important now, moving forward, is the ongoing debate over the details. Over how these rediscovered principles, these lessons of history, might best be leveraged as we take on the decidedly distinct challenges of life in the 21st century. And to that end, I’m very much looking forward to what Mr. Stern has to say. (And keep in mind that Andrés has his own book on garden cities…)

I hope Mr. Stern throws down. But only because I know it’s destined to be picked up and thrown right back.

Game on! CNU registration is gearing up now.

Scott Doyon

If PlaceShakers is our soapbox, our Facebook page is where we step down, grab a drink and enjoy a little conversation. Looking for a heads-up on the latest community-building news and perspective from around the web? Click through and “Like” us and we’ll keep you in the loop.


  1. R. John Anderson says

    Stern’s schtick in Philadelphia was not some well-constructed critique of the New Urbanism. It was a lame straw man argument that lots of design press has polished up over the years in response to (gasp) Celebration.

    I guess we should give the guy a break. Some days even Bob Stern isn’t Bob Stern. Maybe the speech was written by some green staffer in the RAMSA office.

    Somebody gives you an award, the proper thing to do is tell them they suck while talking about your firm’s swell accomplishments like CELEBRATION. The entire membership of the CNU has failed, while RAMSA is doing wonderful things. -it’s also good if you can go on at great length. People love it when you make them miss dinner while you insult them.

    I have the Paradise Planned book and it is excellent. I hope he and his staff continue to publish. I think Mr. Stern is a very accomplished fellow and a schmuck of the highest order.

    • John, I still regret the fact that you and I both missed Stern’s dust-up in Philly because we were both at another event called Friday Night Fights. I was the ring announcer. Seems like I remember you getting a bit bloodied by… was that Emily? I think it was. I do recall Hazel going a round or two with Kunstler.


  1. […] at the beginning of one of the first, most scrutinized, popular new urbanist developments. (H/T to Placemakers Scott Doyon for the recommendation)What better to read about while sitting on a porch-like structure than a […]

Join the Conversation